TIME Magazine Gets DRAGGED for Cringeworthy Review of Bruce Springsteen’s ‘Resist’ Concert
Bruce Springsteen during the premiere for his recent biopic. Credit: Wikimedia Commons
A recent review in TIME Magazine of Bruce Springsteen’s latest “resist” concert tour has drawn criticism online for its tone and dramatic language. The article suggested that historians might one day view one of Springsteen’s performances as among the most determined acts of musical and theatrical opposition directed at President Trump—or any president—in American history.
That description quickly became a target of ridicule on social media, where many users argued the magazine had exaggerated the significance of the tour.
Historians may remember the performance as one of the most unflinching acts of musical and theatrical resistance mounted against Trump—or any President, for that matter—in the nation’s history https://t.co/7Mlt14MvUG
— TIME (@TIME) April 2, 2026
As a historian and former Time magazine music critic and foreign correspondent, I guarantee you historians will not remember anything about Bruce Springsteen, except he was once on our cover. For no apparent reason.
— Michael Walsh (@TheAmanuensis) April 3, 2026
“Historians may remember the performance as one of the most unflinching acts of musical and theatrical resistance…” pic.twitter.com/hnAb4pCuAE
— Reggie Dunlop (@puttinonfoil) April 3, 2026
“Historians”
Might remember this post as the stupidest post in the history of history . pic.twitter.com/Bt3aFlpXKN— Marlon East Of The Pecos (@Darksideleader2) April 3, 2026
RECORD SCRATCH: Bruce Springsteen used his concert in Minneapolis to deliver a blunt message about America, leading critics to label the musician a “traitor.”
Springsteen called America a “predatory rogue nation” under President Trump, sparking social media backlash from users… pic.twitter.com/I864sq7Dl6
— Fox News (@FoxNews) April 2, 2026
Critics say the real legacy of the shows may have less to do with political resistance and more with the high price of tickets combined with lengthy political commentary delivered to audiences during the concerts. Some observers argue that fans who attend a live performance expect music and entertainment, not extended political speeches.
The backlash also reflects a broader frustration among some commentators with celebrities who use their platforms to promote political viewpoints. They argue that many entertainers present their activism as bold or courageous, while critics see it as repetitive and preachy.
For those critics, the issue is not just the performers themselves but also how some media outlets portray them. They believe coverage that frames celebrity political statements as historic or heroic only amplifies the disconnect between the entertainment industry and audiences who simply want to enjoy the music.
About Post Author
