White House Claws Back Nearly $1 Billion in Pork Spending

0
White House Claws Back Nearly  Billion in Pork Spending

 

The Trump White House has moved to cancel nearly $1 billion in congressionally approved spending, targeting what the Office of Management and Budget described as some of “the most harmful government spending” still sitting around in federal accounts.

According to a new roundup of the reporting, the action includes about $810 million in appropriated but unspent funds across 11 funding pools at seven federal departments and agencies. The biggest target: $567 million at Health and Human Services tied to social services for illegal immigrants, refugees, asylees and other migrants, including grants that could flow through nongovernmental organizations. Other cuts reportedly include $50 million for programs aiding immigrants and noncitizens, $70 million for “Woke International Education” grants and fellowships, and $56 million in Housing and Urban Development programs. Highwire summary of CBS/Post/Guardian reporting

The move is being described as a “pocket rescission”, a maneuver where the administration withholds funds close enough to the end of the fiscal year that Congress has little practical time to force the money out the door before it expires. The fiscal year ends Wednesday, which is exactly why the spending lobby is howling now: the clock is their enemy.

Democrats and some institutional Republicans are calling the move illegal or at least an attack on Congress’s power of the purse. Sen. Susan Collins reportedly criticized the rescission, saying it came without warning or consultation. The Government Accountability Office has previously taken the position that pocket rescissions are unlawful. But the White House’s argument is straightforward: taxpayers should not be forced to bankroll stale, ideological, or immigration-related programs just because Congress buried them in a spending bill months ago.

And that is the real fight here. This is not about whether Washington knows how to spend money. Washington is excellent at spending money. It is about whether any president is allowed to say: no, this pile of unspent cash does not need to be shoveled into another grant pipeline before midnight.

The cancellation follows the larger 2025 rescissions fight, when Congress approved roughly $9 billion in Trump-requested cuts to public broadcasting and foreign aid, the first successful presidential rescissions package in decades. AP reported that package cut about $1.1 billion from public broadcasting and nearly $8 billion from foreign aid. Earlier, Reuters reported that even some GOP senators resisted those cuts, especially over public broadcasting and foreign aid. Reuters

The swamp’s complaint is predictable: Congress approved the money, therefore the money must be spent. But ordinary taxpayers hear that and wonder when “approved” became a synonym for “immune from common sense.” A rescission, broadly speaking, is the cancellation of previously appropriated funding; budget explainers note that presidential rescissions are normally sent to Congress for approval, while critics argue pocket rescissions dodge that process. Bipartisan Policy Center, Tax Policy Center

The White House is betting that voters will like the substance more than Washington dislikes the method. Cutting hundreds of millions in migrant-service spending, race-focused grants, and bureaucratic leftovers is not exactly a hard sell outside the Beltway.

Congressional pork defenders can call it a constitutional crisis if they want. Most taxpayers will call it something else: a start.



About Post Author

Discover more from The News Beyond Detroit

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading