Leftist Woman Tries Doxxing ICE Agent Who Shot Renee Good, Instead Doxes Herself Creating Nightmare Scenario
TNBD Community 2 hours ago 0Leftist Woman Tries Doxxing ICE Agent Who Shot Renee Good, Instead Doxes Herself Creating Nightmare Scenario © Stephen Maturen / Getty Images
Posted For: Rotorblade
Jonathan Ross is the man Renee Good was in the process of harming—perhaps even attempting to kill—on the morning of Jan. 7. Faced with a split-second decision, Ross shot a woman who was using her vehicle as a deadly weapon against Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials.
While Good’s precise motivations remain unclear, what is clear is that Ross made the kind of decision law enforcement officers are trained to make—and one that would be made correctly in 99 out of 100 similar situations.
Until recently, most people didn’t know Ross’s name or where he lived. That changed because of the seriousness of the case—and because of one reckless social media user who decided to dox him. That decision quickly backfired.
The video in question was posted to TikTok by user @its.me.sara.g, who claimed she had “a PSA” for the public.
“Jonathan Ross lives in my town, Chaska, Minnesota,” she said in the video. “There are two police squad cars sitting in front of his home.”
She explained that she noticed the police presence while running errands and returned to question officers about why they were there.
“I wanted to ask if they were protecting him or if they’re protecting the general public,” she said. According to her account, officers responded that they were there to protect the community.
“I don’t really believe them,” she added. “They’re protecting him. He’s hiding out in his house. And I’d love for everyone who doesn’t like him to circle around in this neighborhood.”
While pretending not to do so, she effectively gave out Ross’s location and encouraged viewers to harass him. “Go circle around,” she said. “Make him uncomfortable, everybody.”
Someone was made uncomfortable by that video—but it wasn’t Ross.
As tends to happen online, it didn’t take long for users to identify the woman who posted it and determine where she worked. The woman was identified as Sara Larson, a certified massage therapist. Soon after, she disappeared from the “Meet Our Team” page of her employer’s website.
Her former employer, EastWest Acupuncture, later issued a public statement confirming she was no longer employed there:
“We want to clarify the current situation. The individual involved with the recent viral video is no longer employed with EastWest Acupuncture. Their actions were their own and did not represent our standards, values, or expectations as a business.
We also want to acknowledge what has followed. Some members of our team and their families have experienced threats, harassment, and false or misleading reviews. This has been very difficult for those affected, and we kindly ask for understanding and compassion as we work through this.”
The TikTok video has since been removed. By that point, however, the damage was done.
Some will argue that “two wrongs don’t make a right,” or that this is just another example of cancel culture. That argument misses the point. This isn’t cancel culture—it’s accountability.
Larson took a reckless action that put the safety of a man who has not been charged with a crime at risk. She did not do so because she believed his actions were illegal. Even now, the known facts surrounding the incident are exculpatory as they pertain to Ross. She acted because she opposes the enforcement of certain laws and targeted the man involved in enforcing them.
🚨BREAKING: Woman residing in ICE agent Jonathan Ross’s neighborhood is calling on leftists to begin targeting his home for harassment, asserting that he is hiding there. pic.twitter.com/33nxxo0KAs
— I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 (@ImMeme0) January 12, 2026
That is not justice. It’s vigilantism—and it’s dangerous.
Some on the left have praised both Larson and Renee Good. For what, exactly? Their actions do nothing but undermine law enforcement and, in effect, protect criminals—including some of the worst offenders imaginable. Yet they are celebrated anyway.
What we are witnessing is not principled dissent. It is ideological radicalism that frames lawlessness as virtue and accountability as oppression. It is a mindset that casts its adherents as permanent heroes, forever fighting an imaginary tyranny, immune from consequences.
Larson likely assumed there would be no accountability—because, in that worldview, it’s always 2020, and they are always the good guys. When reality intrudes, the narrative flips to complaints about “conservative cancel culture” and “doxing.”
Those may have once been the rules. They aren’t anymore.
Actions have consequences.