“Maybe that the Person in the Media Spewing Bullsh*t to the Public is You” Piers Morgan BLASTS Candace Owens
British television host Piers Morgan clashed sharply with conservative commentator Candace Owens during a heated exchange on Piers Morgan Uncensored, centering on Owens’ past remarks regarding Turning Point USA (TPUSA) and its leadership.
The interview quickly devolved into a tense and combative back-and-forth, with Morgan accusing Owens of irresponsibly promoting conspiracy theories, while Owens accused Morgan and the corporate media of suppressing legitimate inquiry and protecting powerful institutions.
Morgan pressed Owens over previous comments in which she suggested that individuals connected to Turning Point USA were “complicit” in what happened to Charlie Kirk, repeatedly demanding that she identify names and provide evidence. Owens forcefully denied accusing anyone at TPUSA of committing murder, stating that Morgan was mischaracterizing her words.
Owens maintained that her comments referred to an alleged cover-up following Kirk’s death, not to the act itself. She explained that her use of the word “complicit” was made in the context of discussing how large-scale conspiracies historically function, citing the assassination of President John F. Kennedy as an analogy. According to Owens, conspiracies often involve multiple individuals at varying levels who may participate in concealing information, even if they did not carry out the crime.
JUST IN: Sparks fly as Piers Morgan confronts Candace Owens about previous comments she made about TPUSA.
Morgan: When you say that somebody at TPUSA was complicit in his murder, who? Who was?
Owens: I believe that there were multiple people at Turning Point who are, as I have… pic.twitter.com/2haVtDtIXS
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) December 17, 2025
Despite her repeated clarifications, Morgan continued to assert that Owens had explicitly accused individuals at Turning Point USA of being complicit in murder. Owens countered that she had consistently stated her belief that some individuals within the organization were engaged in a cover-up after the fact, not in planning or executing the killing.
The exchange intensified when Morgan asked whether Owens believed anyone at TPUSA had prior knowledge of Kirk’s death. Owens acknowledged that she had privately identified two individuals she believed warranted further scrutiny but said she lacked concrete evidence and therefore refused to name them publicly. She stated that she had communicated her concerns privately to Kirk’s widow and others close to the case, framing her actions as part of an investigative process rather than an accusation.
Morgan sharply criticized Owens for raising such suspicions without proof, arguing that doing so risked causing unnecessary distress. Owens responded that refusing to publicly name individuals without evidence was a responsible choice and accused Morgan of attempting to force her into statements she had never made.
As the interview broadened, Owens accused the corporate media of discouraging questions and repeating official narratives without scrutiny. She argued that unresolved inconsistencies surrounding Kirk’s death justified continued investigation and said the public was entitled to ask uncomfortable questions even in the absence of definitive conclusions.
PIERS: “It may be that the person in the media spewing bullsh*t to the public is you.”
CANDACE: “The difference between me and you is that I have the courage to take the risks and ask the questions … You wait until it becomes popular, and then you change your mind.” pic.twitter.com/bjwNDvpCVQ
— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) December 17, 2025
Morgan pushed back, suggesting Owens herself might be misleading the public. Owens rejected the accusation, asserting that history—including documented media cooperation with intelligence agencies following the JFK assassination—justified skepticism and persistent questioning.
The confrontation ended with Owens telling Morgan that, as with previous disagreements between them, she believed he would ultimately change his position once more information emerged. She framed their disagreement as a contrast between her willingness to ask unpopular questions early and what she described as Morgan’s tendency to wait until consensus shifts.
The exchange underscored the growing divide between mainstream media figures and independent commentators over the boundaries between investigation, speculation, and responsibility in high-profile cases.
About Post Author
