Lawmakers Troubled by Video of 2nd Strike on Boat Survivors
U.S. Navy Adm. Frank M. Bradley, center, accompanied by Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, right, leaves after a meeting with senators on Capitol Hill, Thursday, Dec. 4, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)
Lawmakers on Capitol Hill are demanding answers after reviewing video of a controversial Sept. 2 U.S. military strike in the Caribbean Sea. The footage—shown during a full day of congressional briefings attended by Navy Adm. Frank M. Bradley—depicts two alleged drug smugglers trying to right their overturned vessel before being killed in a second U.S. strike, according to lawmakers who spoke with the Washington Post.
The incident was the first in a series of U.S. operations targeting suspected “drug boats.” Eleven people were killed in the initial strike, sparking serious concerns about both the legality and the ethical basis for the campaign. According to the AP, the 22nd such strike occurred Thursday after nearly three weeks without an operation; four more people were killed, bringing the total death toll to at least 87.
Democratic lawmakers emerged from the briefings visibly shaken. Several called the operation “highly questionable” and pledged to continue investigating. Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut described the video as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service,” emphasizing that the survivors of the first strike appeared clearly distressed and posed no immediate threat when the second strike—ordered by Bradley—was carried out. Reports have circulated that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said, “kill them all,” though Bradley denied that characterization during the meetings. According to CNN, lawmakers said Bradley told them the two survivors did not appear to have any communication equipment that could have allowed them to call for help.
Republican lawmakers, however, have mostly defended the mission. Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas argued that the strikes were “entirely lawful and needful” and said he would have reached the same conclusion. Still, some legal scholars and military personnel have questioned whether survivors clinging to wreckage can be considered lawful targets under U.S. or international law, both of which require protections for incapacitated individuals.
The Pentagon has declined to release the footage publicly, but pressure for transparency is growing. The New York Times notes that the debate over this particular strike may obscure a broader issue: whether any of the boat strikes thus far meet legal standards. Politico explores the widening partisan divide over the campaign, while Axios examines why impeachment efforts against Hegseth are unlikely to succeed.