General Flynn Calls for President Trump to Warn the Nation of Another Deep State Color Revolution
Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn is urging President Trump to deliver a national address in response to what he describes as a “color revolution” being directed against the administration. Flynn argues that recent political messaging, activist campaigns, and legal actions form part of a long-running effort he believes is intended to undermine the president.
Flynn’s appeal follows a recently released video—circulated online and dubbed by some commentators as the “Seditious Six” video—in which several former officials encourage members of the military to “refuse illegal orders,” though no specific orders were identified. Flynn and others say the message resembles tactics used in foreign pressure campaigns aimed at destabilizing governments.
Breaking! General Flynn Calls On President Trump To Immediately Address The Nation Concerning The Color Revolution Being Fomented By The Seditious 6 And The CIA As He Lays Out The String Of Illegal Investigations And Law-fare That The Leftist Have Engaged In Since DJT’s Historic… pic.twitter.com/HYeXQwCNim
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) November 26, 2025
Writers at the outlet ZeroHedge, including one using the pen name “Tyler Durden,” have echoed Flynn’s concerns, warning that tactics seen in overseas political upheavals appear similar to domestic political conflicts that have played out since 2016. They argue that the combination of protest movements, media criticism, legal battles, and activist pressure campaigns reflects a coordinated effort by political opponents, though these claims are disputed and not supported by official investigations.
Supporters of this view frequently list several elements they believe fit a “color revolution” pattern, including:
-
attempts to delegitimize President Trump’s authority,
-
framing routine executive actions as improper or unlawful,
-
calls for military personnel to resist unspecified directives,
-
and efforts to influence public sentiment through protests, leaks, and legal challenges.
I am shouting in the desert.
This Administration just does not listen. I don’t know why. But let me try again because this is serious.
For four years, I worked with the Special Counsel investigation and helped to uncover the details of the Hillary-Soros, and later Obama Plan… pic.twitter.com/3jS7FsuVko
— Svetlana Lokhova (@RealSLokhova) November 27, 2025
Some commentators point to longstanding political battles surrounding the Trump presidency—such as the investigations into Russian interference, the Mueller probe, the Ukraine impeachment, and more recent federal cases—as evidence of a sustained campaign against him. They also cite the Durham investigation, which examined the origins of the Russia inquiry; however, Durham’s report did not substantiate many of the broader conspiracy allegations now circulating among activists and commentators.
Flynn and those who share his perspective argue that these disputes form part of a continuous strategy spanning nearly a decade. Critics counter that the claims rely on speculation, mischaracterizations of investigations, and partisan interpretations rather than established fact.
As these narratives continue to circulate, calls for President Trump to address the nation reflect growing concern among his supporters about what they see as ongoing attempts to weaken or destabilize his administration, while opponents argue that such claims escalate political tensions and misrepresent legitimate political and legal processes.
About Post Author
