Far-Left Actress Jamie Lee Curtis Sobs When Discussing ‘Man of Faith’ Charlie Kirk’s Assassination
Getty Images
Actress Jamie Lee Curtis is known for her outspoken progressive views, but in a rare moment of unity across political lines, she offered a surprisingly heartfelt and compassionate response to the tragic death of conservative activist and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.
Curtis appeared on Marc Maron’s podcast on Monday, where she discussed a range of topics, including Kirk’s recent assassination. Despite her well-documented political disagreements with Kirk, Curtis was visibly emotional as she reflected on the shocking loss.
In an initial slip of the tongue, Curtis mistakenly referred to Kirk as “Charlie Crist,” but quickly corrected herself and used the moment to speak to what she perceived as Kirk’s deep religious conviction.
“I’m sorry,” she said after being corrected by Maron. “Kirk. I just called him Crist. I think because of Christ. Because of his deep, deep belief. I mean, I disagreed with him on almost every point I ever heard him say, but I believe he was a man of faith.”
Actress and film producer Jamie Lee Curtis breaks down in tears over the death of Charlie Kirk.
“I mean, I disagreed with him on almost every point I ever heard him say…”
“But I believe he was a man of faith, and I hope in that moment when he died, that he felt connected to… pic.twitter.com/Bhv2UZrMhU
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 16, 2025
Curtis became emotional as she continued, her voice trembling: “And I hope in that moment when he died, he felt connected to his faith. Even though I find what he… his ideas were abhorrent to me, I still believe he was a father, a husband, and a man of faith, and I hope whatever connection to God means, that he felt it.”
She later transitioned to talking about broader cultural themes, referencing 9/11 and the toll of being “constantly bombarded” with disturbing images and events. Still, her reflection on Kirk’s death stood out — especially in contrast to some of the more hostile or dismissive reactions seen on social media from both sides of the political aisle.
Curtis’s comments, though framed through her personal political lens, resonated with a basic human decency — recognizing the loss of a life and the grief of a family, regardless of ideological divides.
In a time when public discourse is often driven by outrage and division, her response served as a reminder that empathy need not be partisan. Regardless of differing views, acknowledging someone’s humanity — especially in the face of tragedy — is a principle that transcends politics.
About Post Author
