It’s long past time to end Democrats’ Voting Rights Act scam

It’s long past time to end Democrats’ Voting Rights Act scam

Posted For: Willie Wonka 

Democrats and their media allies are sounding the alarm that the US Supreme Court is “dismantling” the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The Washington Post warns that this term the court will likely strip black voters of their right to elect “someone who represents them.”

Don’t believe it. Truth is, the Democratic Party has converted the Voting Rights Act into a scam.

Twenty-two congressional districts in the United States are engineered to guarantee that black voters are in the majority. These rigged districts elect Democrats every time, without fail, though not always a black Democrat. (Democrat Rashida Tlaib, an Arab-American, represents Michigan’s black-majority 13th Congressional District.)

Not one of these racially gerrymandered — not to be confused with partisan gerrymandering, though that’s usually a racial gerrymander’s result — districts elects a Republican. Ever.

Twenty-two rigged districts — that’s nearly three times the size of the Democrats’ majority in the House.

This racial gerrymandering is being done to comply with the Voting Rights Act, a law that was urgently needed but has outlived its usefulness. Now it’s being used cynically as a tool to lock in Democratic Party dominance.

America doesn’t need a rigged election map to ensure black candidates are elected. Most black members of Congress, including 35 out of 53 members of the Congressional Black Caucus, are elected from districts without black majorities.

In Merrill v. Milligan, the Biden Justice Department is joining forces with the NAACP to keep the scam going. They are challenging the state of Alabama’s election map, explicitly demanding that at least two of the seven congressional districts have guaranteed black voting majorities. Alabama now has one.

Last week, the Supreme Court heard two hours of impassioned oral argument over whether it should compel Alabama to maximize the number of minority-controlled voting districts.

The Biden administration and the NAACP are challenging Alabama’s election map.
The Biden administration and the NAACP are challenging Alabama’s election map.
Bryan Olin Dozier/NurPhoto via ZUMA Press

Alabama argues it’s time to end “racial gerrymandering.” Creating a second black-majority district would require splitting up the state’s coastal region, on the premise that race is more important than the commercial and environmental concerns that seacoast residents, black and white alike, want represented in Congress.

President Joe Biden’s solicitor general, Elizabeth Prelogar, told the justices eliminating racial gerrymandering would “leave black voters” with “no ability to elect their preferred representatives.” That argument is laughable.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was scheduled to last only five years. Congress has renewed it four times for long stretches, despite the huge progress the nation has made toward a fair, multiracial democracy.

In 1965, there was nearly a 50% gap between white and black voter turnout in Alabama. By 2012, black voters in Alabama were turning out at higher rates than whites.

Black candidates compete effectively in white-majority areas. Georgia has a black US senator, and his GOP challenger is also black. South Carolina has a black Republican senator.

The Roberts court has long deemed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 an anachronism. In 2013, in Shelby County v. Holder, the court invalidated portions of it, explaining the act’s “strong medicine” was needed 50 years ago to thwart racial discrimination in voting, “an insidious and pervasive evil,” but no longer is justified by “current conditions.”

Now the court should strike down the rest of this obsolete statute. All Americans, including blacks, deserve a fair chance to participate in our democracy. But racial gerrymandering is no longer necessary.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said that drawing district lines by race will “exacerbate racial tensions."
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said that drawing district lines by race will “exacerbate racial tensions.”
REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

Segregating voters by race presumes, odiously, that only a black can represent blacks, and by implication, only a white can represent whites. Americans know better. They elected a black man to be their president twice.

Justice Clarence Thomas cautions that drawing district lines by race will “exacerbate racial tensions” rather than rewarding candidates who “build bridges between racial groups.”

The Democratic Party, with a thin House majority, would have liked to grab control of a second Alabama district in time for the midterm elections. The court’s decision to hear Merrill v. Milligan ended that ploy.

Ultimately the stakes are higher than one Alabama district. Across the nation, election districts are being rigged to benefit the Democratic Party, under the false pretense of protecting black voting rights.

It’s time to end that outrage.

%d bloggers like this: