Sheriff’s deputies carry out dawn raid on VACANT Oakland home & kick out 4 homeless mothers and children

Protests erupt across city over lack of affordable housing – Two arrested

By Associated Press and Matthew Wright

Homeless women ordered by a California judge last week to leave a vacant house they have illegally occupied in Oakland for two months were evicted before dawn Tuesday by sheriff’s deputies in a case that highlighted the state’s severe housing shortage and homeless crisis.

Alameda County Sheriff’s deputies, some dressed in military-style fatigues, escorted two women with the Moms 4 Housing group from the home and bound their hands with plastic ties, as dozens of activists on the sidewalk chanted ‘Let the moms go! Let the moms go!’ and recorded the chaotic scene with their cellphones.

Two men were also arrested. All four had been released by Tuesday afternoon. A GoFundMe for the mothers has raised close to $40,000 after setting an initial goal of $2,000. 

The women decried the show of force and declared their fight far from over in a city where a one-night count of the homeless jumped 47% in two years to more than 4,000 last year, while the median house sales price is about $750,000. Deputies boarded up the house with plywood, and a chain link fence was later erected around the property.

Deputies who carried out the eviction ‘came in like an army for mothers and babies,’ said Dominique Walker, one of the mothers who was not arrested. ‘We have the right to housing. This is just the beginning.’

How permanently the women have changed the conversation around what is an intractable – and statewide – problem remains to be seen. An uptick in the U.S. homeless population last year was driven entirely by a 16% increase in California, federal officials have said, and the governor has pledged to tackle the twin crises of homelessness and deep housing unaffordability.

The Oakland women have said nobody should be homeless when investment companies are buying and fixing up properties to sell at profit. The occupied house in the distressed west Oakland neighborhood is owned by Wedgewood Inc., a Southern California real estate investment group that bought the property at a foreclosure auction last year for just over $500,000.

Wedgewood said it plans to work with the nonprofit group Shelter 37 to renovate the property with help from at-risk youth and will split profits from the home’s sale with Shelter 37.

Squatting is nothing new in the San Francisco Bay Area, said Needa Bee, a homeless mother who works with The Village in Oakland group to shelter homeless people, in some cases inside houses that belong to others.

The group identified nine unoccupied homes over the last year for 40 homeless people, she said. Some properties targeted for squatting included homes owned by banks and investment firms. Others were homes owned by people having trouble paying property taxes, and who welcomed the homeless as tenants in exchange for the group’s help paying taxes or making repairs.

The group also plans to build homes and a solar shower on a median strip in an East Oakland neighborhood currently used as an illegal trash dump, Bee said.

‘We live in a society that is pro-property owners and pro-capitalist so when you have that kind of value system, you’re going to have people who live on medians and who are harassed for living on medians,’ Bee said.

The women who were evicted Tuesday moved into the three-bedroom house in November with their children, partly to protest the methods of speculators who they have claimed snap up distressed homes and leave them empty despite California’s housing shortage.

They also wanted to highlight the plight of African Americans in the U.S. who were historically shut out of owning property and forced into substandard neighborhoods that are now popular with wealthier, and often whiter, residents.

African Americans are about a quarter of Oakland’s population, but made up 70% of homeless counted.

‘We live in a society that is anti-poverty, that is anti-black,’ Bee said.

Alameda County Superior Court Judge Patrick McKinney ruled Friday the women did not have the right to stay and had to leave within five days. McKinney said the courtroom was not the place to address issues of housing and homelessness.

Still, McKinney allowed lawyers for Walker, and her recently formed collective, Moms 4 Housing, to make their case. They argued that housing is a right and that the court must give the women the right to possess the house, especially because it sat vacant for so long and because the alternative would be to send the women to live on the streets.

On Tuesday, Sgt. Ray Kelly, spokesman for the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office, called the high-profile eviction a success because authorities feared a potential for violence.

‘There was a tremendous amount of work that went into this and we had to think outside the box a little bit,’ Kelly said.

Officers then boarded up the house with plywood and said it is up to Oakland police to arrest anyone caught trespassing. The house did not contain many belongings, Kelly said, and Wedgewood is responsible for returning those belongings.

Kelly said the department is considering billing Wedgewood for the ‘tens of thousands of dollars’ associated with enforcing the eviction.

The people arrested will be booked on misdemeanor charges of resisting and obstruction, he said. No children were present during the 5.15am eviction because the mothers had sent them away for safekeeping.

Wedgewood said the company was pleased ‘the illegal occupation of its Oakland home has ended peacefully.’

Moms 4 Housing said after the eviction that its efforts will continue despite the arrests.

‘We’ve built a movement of thousands of Oaklanders who showed up at a moments notice to reject police violence and advocate for homes for families,’ the group tweeted. ‘This isn´t over, and it won´t be over until everyone in the Oakland community has a safe and dignified place to live.’

California continues to grapple with an escalating homelessness crisis. 

Governor Gavin Newsom is seeking $1.4billion dollars from lawmakers to tackle the growing problem in his state and plans to use the money to open shelters, pay rent and provide health care, his office said.

The Democratic governor, who plans to formally submit his proposal on Friday, this week also signed an executive order directing agencies to identify state-owned land that can be used as temporary shelters for the homeless.

‘Homelessness is a national crisis, one that’s spreading across the West Coast and cities across the country,’ Newsom said in a statement.

His executive order also calls for the supply of 100 camp trailers for temporary housing and to deliver health services, as well as the creation of a crisis response team to address street homelessness.

His proposals come amid an escalating homelessness crisis in California, despite hundreds of millions of dollars pledged in recent years to address the problem.

According to a report published this week by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, nearly 568,000 people experienced homelessness on a single night last year across America, with more than a quarter of them – about 151,000 – living in California.

The report said homelessness in California increased by 21,306, or 16.4 per cent, between 2018 and 2019, which is more than the total national increase of every other state combined.

One the key reasons for the mounting numbers is a severe shortage of affordable housing and gentrification sweeping many California cities. 

Newsom hopes his 2020-2021 budget proposal to tackle homelessness will help stem the crisis in the country’s most populous state, which boasts the fifth-largest economy in the world.

According to his office, his plan calls for $750million that would be used to pay rent for homeless people and for the building of affordable housing.

An additional almost $700million in state and federal matching funds would be allocated on preventive health care.

‘Californians have lots of compassion for those among us who are living without shelter,’ Newsom said. ‘But we also know what compassion isn’t. Compassion isn’t allowing a person suffering a severe psychotic break or from a lethal substance abuse addiction to literally drift towards death on our streets and sidewalks.’

%d bloggers like this: